Task-specific source comparisons
A bounded question, with its limits
MIRA 6X or 9X: separate the body, work area and input power
The installation question needs body and access facts. Working area and an optical-output number cannot fill them.
Both reviewed MIRA references have separately sourced body dimensions, working areas and electrical-input values. They do not establish service/lid/loading clearances, ordered supply, an approved extraction route or actual average energy use. Both exact variant prices remain unresolved; no complete delivered-cost winner is established.
| Question | MIRA 6X 40W RF CO2 reference | MIRA 9X 75W RF CO2 reference |
|---|---|---|
| Source type | co2 rf | co2 rf |
| Generation / revision | unknown / unknown | unknown / unknown |
| Published power label | Unknown | Unknown |
| Stated optical output W | 40 | 75 |
| Electrical input W | 960 | 1460 |
| Working area mm | 600 × 300 | 900 × 450 |
| Dated exact-package observations | Unpriced / configuration required / stock unknown / 2026-11-07 | Unpriced / configuration required / stock unknown / 2026-11-07 |
| Ordered region / supply | unknown / unknown V | unknown / unknown V |
MIRA 6X 40W RF CO2 reference
Separate the body from the working area
Two literal source rectangles at a shared scale within this pair. Source axes are retained separately; their orientations are not reconciled or nested.
External body axes
Source external length 850 mm; width 530 mm.
Working-area axes
600 × 300 mm; this is not a machine footprint.
Source external height 350 mm, shown as a separate fact rather than plotted.
Original source-based dimensions, not a machine photograph, packing drawing, operating clearance or installation approval. No lid, stand, handle, loading, service or extraction reservation is derived from these rectangles. Source-stated dimensions are not independent measurements.
MIRA 9X 75W RF CO2 reference
Separate the body from the working area
Two literal source rectangles at a shared scale within this pair. Source axes are retained separately; their orientations are not reconciled or nested.
External body axes
Source external length 1160 mm; width 690 mm.
Working-area axes
900 × 450 mm; this is not a machine footprint.
Source external height 420 mm, shown as a separate fact rather than plotted.
Original source-based dimensions, not a machine photograph, packing drawing, operating clearance or installation approval. No lid, stand, handle, loading, service or extraction reservation is derived from these rectangles. Source-stated dimensions are not independent measurements.
One reference, different power bases
MIRA 6X 40W RF CO2 reference — manufacturer-stated examples, not independent measurements.
Input specification
960 WSpecifications: total machine power
Source · 2026-11-07≠
Optical rating
40 WManufacturer laser-output rating.
Source · 2026-11-07Original fact comparison, not an efficiency calculation, wiring diagram or power ranking. A name such as B1 “20W” stays a label where its optical basis is unresolved; source type, process and setup may change the decision.
What the supporting record says
MIRA 6X 40W RF CO2 reference
body height mm: 350 mm · Source · 2026-11-07.
footprint length mm: 850 mm · Source · 2026-11-07.
footprint width mm: 530 mm · Source · 2026-11-07.
manufacturer claim: wood / cutting. No thickness, grade, settings, quality or measured throughput established. Source · 2026-11-07
manufacturer claim: acrylic / cutting. No thickness, grade, settings, quality or measured throughput established. Source · 2026-11-07
MIRA 9X 75W RF CO2 reference
body height mm: 420 mm · Source · 2026-11-07.
footprint length mm: 1160 mm · Source · 2026-11-07.
footprint width mm: 690 mm · Source · 2026-11-07.
manufacturer claim: wood / cutting. No thickness, grade, settings, quality or measured throughput established. Source · 2026-11-07
manufacturer claim: acrylic / cutting. No thickness, grade, settings, quality or measured throughput established. Source · 2026-11-07
Evidence and complete costs
Reviewed test coverage and strict comparability rules
0 independently measured process pairs meet the strict retained material/condition comparability rules. Larger labels, different material claims and nominal speed figures are not an overall winner. Stock, many setup requirements and destination-specific charges remain unknown.
Use exact included contents and required-component status when planning the setup. A dated package observation is neither a current checkout total nor a complete operating cost. Do not transfer a lower-power price, generic accessory fit, regional policy or license entitlement across these references.
Open the editable exact comparison
Opening this public comparison does not overwrite a saved comparison or project. Saving or creating a setup remains explicit.
Continue with the useful next question
Explain project constraints · Original editable project path · Space/access assumptions · Build exact editable lists · Seller and delivered-cost questions · Existing vs target setup costs
Free learning path · Print/share selected source questions · Commercial disclosure